- Overview
- Attack Efficiency Analysis
- Invisible Exposure Matrix
- Observation-to-Disclosure Model
- Synthetic Scenario Lab
- Evidence & Provenance
- Research Methodology
Observation-to-Disclosure Model
Four stages. No matched conversion rates.
01
ACTUAL ATTACK ACTIVITY
The underlying activity that may be incompletely observable. It is not recovered by counting alerts.
- Sensor coverage gaps
- Detection uncertainty
02
OBSERVED SIGNALS
Events captured by sensors, logs, and monitoring systems. Coverage and detection shape this layer.
- Sensor coverage gaps
- Detection uncertainty
- Investigation delays
03
CONFIRMED COMPROMISE
Cases where investigation establishes successful unauthorized access or impact.
- Verification constraints
- Investigation delays
04
PUBLIC DISCLOSURE
Incidents made visible through public reporting. Disclosure is a selection process, not a census.
- Disclosure selection effects
- Reporting latency
Constraints
- — Not every attack signal corresponds to a unique attack.
- — Not every compromise produces a public disclosure.
- — Not every public disclosure represents a single attack.
- — This pathway is conceptual. It is not a conversion funnel and has no numerical rates unless matched cohorts exist.
- Underlying: 5000 · MODELLED
- Observed: 1224 · OBSERVED
Synthetic illustration of coverage versus observed signals
Unit: synthetic attack_attempts
Time window: scenario C closed-form
Measurement scope: Reduced monitoring coverage illustration
Data origin: SYNTHETIC
SYNTHETIC — NOT REAL-WORLD OBSERVATION